This determination sets the deemed rate of return, used to calculate foreign investment fund income under the deemed rate of return calculation method, for the 2025-26 income year at 7.84%. The deemed rate of return set for the 2024-25 income year was 8.04%.
This determination sets the deemed rate of return, used to calculate foreign investment fund income under the deemed rate of return calculation method, for the 2025-26 income year at 7.84%. The deemed rate of return set for the 2024-25 income year was 8.04%.
Determination DET 26/03 declares the Wellington severe weather event in April 2026 is an emergency event for the purposes of family scheme income.
QB 26/01 GST – Registered members of unregistered unincorporated bodies
QB 26/01 GST – Registered members of unregistered unincorporated bodies
IS 26/10 Income tax implications of providing sponsorship
This interpretation statement considers the income tax implications for a business that provides sponsorship to an organisation, event, person or cause, where the taxpayer (the sponsor) intends that the sponsorship will promote or advertise the business. The sponsorship may be provided in the form of money or by providing products or services.
IS 26/10 FS 1 Income tax implications of providing sponsorship - fact sheet
CSUM 26/03 Taxpayers’ appeal against evasion shortfall penalties dismissed
Six appellants (four brothers and two brothers-in-law) appealed a Taxation and Charities Review Authority (Authority) decision upholding the Commissioner of Inland Revenue’s (Commissioner) assessments and imposition of evasion shortfall penalties. The appellants abandoned their appeal against the underlying income tax and Working for Families Tax Credits (WfFTC) reassessments, leaving only an appeal on whether the Commissioner had proved evasion for the purposes of s 141E.
The High Court held that the Commissioner had the onus of proving that in taking their respective tax positions, each appellant intentionally avoided the payment of income tax in circumstances where he knew he was or may be under an obligation to pay. The Judge upheld the Authority’s findings that the absence of records and implausible explanations given, meant that the evasion shortfall penalties were correctly imposed, and the appeal was dismissed.
| Reference | Title | Closes |
|---|---|---|
| ED0261 | Options for relief from tax debt | 08 May 2026 |
| PUB00544 | Income tax – Bare trusts and mortgages | 11 May 2026 |
| PUB00511 | Goods and services tax – Reduced value rule in s 10(6) for supplies of domestic goods and services in commercial dwellings | 29 May 2026 |
| PUB00545 | GST – Directors’ fees and board members’ fees | 11 June 2026 |
| PUB00530 | GST – Types of unincorporated bodies | 17 June 2026 |
Popular searches
National average market values of specified livestock
National standard costs for specified livestock
Kilometre rates for the business use of vehicles
Square metre rate for the dual use of premises
Consultations closing soon
ED0261: Options for relief from tax debt
Consultation closes: 8 May 2026