Skip to main content
CSUM 26/12
Issued
09 Oct 2026
Decision
07 Sep 2026
Court
NZHC
Appeal Status
Pending

Taxpayer required to pay GST on insurance sum

Mainzeal [MZ} received funds from an insurer [QBE] for damage caused by four of MZ’s directors. The CIR considered the payment was subject to GST under s 5(13) GSTA because it was paid in relation “to a loss incurred in the course or furtherance of [MZ’s] taxable activity”. MZ argued it was not because the payment was not received “under a contract of insurance”.

The High Court considered the legislative history of s 5(13) GSTA to conclude MZ did receive the payment in relation “to a loss incurred in the course or furtherance of [MZ’s] taxable activity” and that it was subject to GST.

Case
Mainzeal Property & Construction Limited (in liq) v CIR [2026] NZHC 2715
Legal terms
under a contract of insurance, whether or not the person is a party to the contract

Goods and Services Act 1985 s 5(13)
Legislation Act 2019 s 10
Law Reform Act 1936

CIR v Roberts [2019] NZCA 654, (2019) NZTC 24-026
Pegasus Group Ltd v QBE Insurance (International) Ltd HC Auckland CIV-2006-404-6941, 24
September 2010.
Southland Indoor Leisure Centre Charitable Trust v Invercargill City Council [2015] NZHC 1983