Taxpayer required to pay GST on insurance sum
Mainzeal [MZ} received funds from an insurer [QBE] for damage caused by four of MZ’s directors. The CIR considered the payment was subject to GST under s 5(13) GSTA because it was paid in relation “to a loss incurred in the course or furtherance of [MZ’s] taxable activity”. MZ argued it was not because the payment was not received “under a contract of insurance”.
The High Court considered the legislative history of s 5(13) GSTA to conclude MZ did receive the payment in relation “to a loss incurred in the course or furtherance of [MZ’s] taxable activity” and that it was subject to GST.
Goods and Services Act 1985 s 5(13)
Legislation Act 2019 s 10
Law Reform Act 1936
CIR v Roberts [2019] NZCA 654, (2019) NZTC 24-026
Pegasus Group Ltd v QBE Insurance (International) Ltd HC Auckland CIV-2006-404-6941, 24
September 2010.
Southland Indoor Leisure Centre Charitable Trust v Invercargill City Council [2015] NZHC 1983