Skip to main content
IS 21/01
Issued
28 Jan 2021
Published
29 Jan 2021

GST and agency

This interpretation statement considers whether a person is acting as an agent or as a principal for the purposes of the Goods and Services Tax Act 1985.  It is primarily concerned with how ss 60(1) and (2) apply and identifies features that support an agency relationship existing for a supply.  It also explains how the Act can operate to modify an agency relationship.

Tax Information Bulletin Vol 33 No 2 - March 2021

Goods and Services Tax Act 1985 – s 3A, s 20(3C)(a), s 24(1), s 58, s 59, s 60(1), s 60(1A), s 60(1AB), s 60(1B), s 60(1C), s 60(2), s 60(3), s 60(4), s 60(5), s 60(6), s 60(7), s 60C, s 60D, s 75, s 75(3E)

Au Pied du Mont Sainte-Anne Condominiums v Canada [2004] TCJ No 22 (TCC)
Canada v Merchant Law Group [2010] FCJ No 990 (FCA)
Case R34 (1994) 16 NZTC 6,190
Case T35 (1997) 18 NZTC 8,235
Case 14/2014 (2014) 26 NZTC 2,024
Chatham Islands Enterprise Trust v CIR (1999) 19 NZTC 15,075 (CA)
CIR v Capital Enterprises Ltd (2002) 20 NZTC 17,511 (HC)
CIR v Databank Systems Ltd (1989) 11 NZTC 6,093 (CA)
CIR v New Zealand Refining Co Ltd (1997) 18 NZTC 13,187 (CA)
Commerce Commission v Harmoney Ltd [2018] NZHC 1107
Commissioner of Customs & Excise v Plantiflor [2002] UKHL 33
Customs and Excise Commissioners v Music and Video Exchange Ltd [1992] STC 220 (HC)
Customs & Excise Commissioners v Reed Personnel Services Ltd [1995] BVC 222 (HC)
Durham Aged Mineworkers’ Homes Association v Customs & Excise Commissioners [1994] STC 553 (QB)
Estate Realities Ltd v Wignall [1992] 2 NZLR 615 (HC)
Fenswick International Ltd v GR International Ltd [2014] NZHC 1119
Fraser-Ramsay (New Zealand) (Limited) v De Renzy (1912) 32 NZLR 553 (SC)
Gannow Engineering Co Ltd v Richardson [1930] NZLR 361 (SC)
Garnac Grain Co Inc v HMF Faure & Fairclough Ltd and Bunge Corporation [1967] 2 All ER 353 (HL)
Glengarry Bingo Assn v Canada [1999] FCJ No 316 (FCA)
Harding and Ors v CIR (1976) 2 NZTC 61,145 (SC)
Hill and Another (trading as JK Hill & Co) v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1988] STC 424 (HC)
HMRC v Secret Hotels2 Limited [2014] UKSC 16
ID Tours New Zealand Limited v CIR [2015] NZHC 483, (2015) 27 NZTC 22,001
Lower Hutt City v Attorney-General [1965] NZLR 65 (CA)
Marac Life Assurance Limited v CIR (1986) 8 NZTC 5,086 (CA)
Masport Ltd v Morrison Industries Ltd CA 392/92 31 August 1993
Paper Reclaim Ltd v Aotearoa International Ltd [2007] NZSC 26
Potter and Another (trading as P&R Potter Wholesale) v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1985] STC 45 (CA)
Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Aimia Coalition Loyalty UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 15
Spearmint Rhino Ventures (UK) Limited v HMRC [2007] EWHC 613 (Ch)
Stiassny v North Shore City Council [2008] NZCA 522
CIR v Suzuki NZ Ltd (2000) 19 NZTC 15,819 (HC)
Suzuki NZ Ltd v CIR (2001) 20 NZTC 17,096 (CA)
Westpac Banking Corporation v Savin and Ors (1986) 1 NZBLC 102,345 (CA)
Zhong v Wang [2006] NZCA 242