Double Taxation Relief (Belgium) Order 1983
Archived legislative commentary on the Double Taxation Relief (Belgium) Order 1983 (SR 1983/207) from PIB vol 112, suppl 12 Jun 1984.
This commentary item was published in Public Information Bulletin Volume 112, Supplement No. 12, June 1984
Double Taxation Agreement Convention With Belgium
Part I - Introduction
The text of the convention has been published as a schedule to an Order in Council (SR 1983/207) which is available to the public from Government Bookshops.
The convention entered into force on 8 December 1983 with effect:
(a) In New Zealand:
- in respect of income assessable for any income year beginning on or after 1 April 1984,
(b) In Belgium:
- in respect of all taxes due at source, on income credited or payable on or after 1 January 1984,
- in respect of all taxes other than taxes due at source, on income of taxable periods ending on or after 31 December 1984.
Part II - Notes on the Convention Article by Article
Article 1 - Personal Scope
The convention applies to persons who are residents of one or both of the contracting states.
Article 2 - Taxes Covered
The convention covers in the case of:
(a) New Zealand:
- Income tax and excess retention tax but not bonus issue tax or property speculation tax.
- the individual tax (L'impot des personnes physiques - de personenbelasting);
- the corporate income tax (l'impot des societes - de vennootschapsbelasting);
- the income tax on legal entities (l'impot des personnes morales - de rechtspersonenbelasting);
- the income tax on non-residents (l'impot des non residents - de belasting der niet-verblijfhouders);
- the exceptional and temporary solidarity contribution (la participation exceptionelle et temporaire de solidarite - de buitengewone en tijdelijke solidariteitsbijdrage);
including the prepayments, the surcharges on these taxes and prepayments, and the supplements to the individual income tax.
The convention does not apply to the corporate tax payable where a Belgian company repurchases its own shares or in the event of the distribution of its assets.
Article 3 - General Definition
1. "National": Paragraph 1(f)
The term "national" is used in paragraph 2(c) and (d) of Article 4 in determining resident status. It is also used in Article 19 Government Service.
In New Zealand the term covers a citizen of New Zealand and any legal person, partnership or association under the law in force in New Zealand.
In Belgium the term covers any individual possessing the nationality of Belgium, any legal person, partnership or association under the law in force in Belgium.
2. Undefined Terms: Paragraph 4
This is a standard provision. Where a term is not defined it has the meaning applicable under the domestic law of the country applying the convention.
Article 4 - Resident
1. Paragraph 1 defines the meaning of the term "resident of a state" (ie, for the purposes of Article 1). In effect the defined term is a reference to the domestic law of each country. Whenever the term is used in the convention the residence of the taxpayer must first be determined in accordance with this Article.
A Belgian company which is not limited by shares is included in this term notwithstanding that it has elected to have its profits subject to the individual income tax.
2. Paragraph 2 sets out the tests to be applied to solve the problem of a dual resident individual. Dual residence arises when a taxpayer is resident in both countries by virtue of the domestic law of each country. For example, an individual may have his permanent home in State A, where his wife and children live, and consequently, he is deemed to be resident in that State under its domestic law. However, he has spent 6 months of the year in State B and for that reason he is deemed to be resident in that State under its domestic law. This conflict is resolved by the tests set out in paragraph 2 giving preference to the claim of State A.
3. Paragraph 3 sets out the rule to determine the case of a company or other legal person which is resident in both countries. Residence will be where the place of effective management of the enterprise is situated. In this respect New Zealand views the term "effective management" as meaning the practical day to day management, irrespective of where the overriding control is exercised.
4. In applying the tests to dual residents, it should be remembered that these tests apply only for the purposes of the tax convention. If the person resident in New Zealand (domestic law test) becomes for the purposes of the convention a "resident of Belgium" after the tests have been applied, this does not mean that he is a non-resident for all purposes of New Zealand tax law. For example he can never be subject to non-resident withholding tax, the reason being that although he is treated as a non-resident for certain purposes of the convention, he is still a resident under the New Zealand Income Tax Act. What it does mean is that he is entitled to any benefits granted by the convention to a "resident of Belgium". Thus, although not subject to withholding tax on, for example, New Zealand royalty income, he would still qualify for the 10 percent limitation in the convention.
Article 5 - Permanent Establishment
This Article defines the term "permanent establishment". This concept determines the right of a contracting state to tax the profits of an "enterprise of the other state". Due to the inclusion of the words "includes especially" in paragraph 2, the examples cited as constituting a permanent establishment are by no means exhaustive.
The definition of "permanent establishment" is fairly standard but the following points should be noted:
|Paragraph 3||A building site or construction or installation project constitutes a permanent establishment if it lasts more than 12 months.|
|Paragrpah 5||An enterprise shall be deemed to have a permanent establishment if:|
Article 6 - Income from Real Property
This Article recognises the internationally accepted practice in relation to income from land and the exploitation of land or landed property. The Article also applies to such items as rents, natural resource royalties, farming profits, etc. The principle of the Article is that income from "real property" may be taxed in the country where the property is situated. "Real property" is not defined in our general law but the Article provides extensive definition. Ships and aircraft are specifically excluded from the term "real property".
The Article involves no change in current practice in relation to the income covered.
Article 7 - Business Profits
This Article is in many respects a continuation of, and a corollary to, Article 5 on the definition of the concept of permanent establishment. Under Article 7 a contracting state cannot tax the profits of an enterprise of the other Contracting State unless it carries on its business through a permanent establishment situated therein. If a permanent establishment exists the Article goes on to lay down a set of rules by reference to which the profits of the permanent establishment are to be calculated.
Before dealing with the salient features of the Article some comment is warranted on the importance of paragraph 7. This is because reference to this Article and Article 5 will not always be necessary to determine the liability of the specific types of income. In effect paragraph 7 gives first preference to the other Articles in the convention. It follows that this Article will only be applicable to business profits which do not belong to the categories of income covered by the special Articles, and in addition, to dividends, royalties and interest which specifically come within the circumstances detailed in paragraphs 4 of Articles 10, 11 and 12, and consequently fall within Article 7.
1. Paragraph 1 expresses the general rule that profits are taxable only in the country of residence unless the enterprise is engaged in business in the other country through a permanent establishment, in which case the other country may tax the profits of the permanent establishment.
It is important to note that only income attributable directly to the permanent establishment's operations can form part of the establishment's operations. This does not mean that income which is not directly attributable to the establishment's operations escapes liability for tax (see second paragraph above). For example, the restriction on the rate of tax imposed by paragraph 2 of Articles 10, 11 and 12, which concern dividend, interest and royalty payments respectively, would apply if such income did not arise from the permanent establishment's operations.
2. Paragraph 2 contains the normal provision enabling arm's-length profits to be attributed to the permanent establishment if necessary.
3. Paragraph 3 merely expresses the taxpayer's right to deduct from the profits of the permanent establishment the expenses incurred for the purposes of the permanent establishment even if those expenses are incurred outside the country where the permanent establishment is situated.
4. Paragraph 4 provides that where the profits to be attributed to a permanent establishment are determined, not on the basis of separate accounts or by making an estimate of arm's-length profit, but simply by apportioning the total profits of the enterprise by reference to various formulae then such a method may continue to be employed provided it has been customary to adopt such a practice. Such a method differs from those envisaged in paragraph 2 of Article 7, since it contemplates not an attribution of profits on a separate enterprise footing, but an apportionment of total profits. However, in general the profits to be attributed to a permanent establishment should be determined by reference to the establishment's accounts if these reflect the real facts. A method of allocation which is based on apportioning total profits is generally not as appropriate as a method which has regard only to the activities of the permanent establishment and should be used only where it has, as a matter of history, been customary in the past and is accepted by the Department and taxpayer as being satisfactory.
5. Paragraph 5 precludes the attribution of profits to a permanent establishment by reason of merely purchasing activities carried on by the permanent establishment for the enterprise.
6. Paragraph 6 provides that unless there are good and sufficient reasons to the contrary the profits attributed to a permanent establishment must be determined by the same method each year.
7. Paragraph 7: refer to initial comments above on this Article.
8. Protocol paragraph (a) provides that the calculation of income and computation of profits from insurance are not subject to the provisions of this Article. Such income may be taxed in accordance with the domestic law of each country.
Article 8 - Shipping and Aircraft
1. Under this Article profits from operating ships or aircraft in "international traffic" - defined in Article 31. (g) - are to be taxed only in the country in which the place of effective management of the enterprise is situated. International shipping and aircraft profits include income from:
- carriage of passengers and cargo;
- sale of passenger tickets on behalf of other enterprises;
- commercial advertising;
- charter fees (but refer paragraph 3. below).
2. Due to the definition of "international traffic" exemption does not extend to profits derived from coastal traffic. Further, investment income of shipping and air transport enterprises is subject to the treatment ordinarily applied to that class of income, eg, dividends derived would be subject to Article 10.
3. Profits obtained from leasing a ship or aircraft on charter fully equipped, manned and supplied, whether or not the enterprise providing the ship or aircraft actually owns them, would be treated as profits from the operation of a ship or aircraft. However, the Article does not extend to profits from leasing a ship or aircraft on a bare boat charter basis except when it is an occasional source of income for an enterprise engaged in the international operation of ships or aircraft. Apart from this one exception, bare boat charter fees would normally be classified as business profits and consequently dealt with under Article 7.
Article 9 - Associated Enterprises
This is a standard Article enabling an arm's-length profit to be attributed to associated enterprises.
Article 10 - Dividends
1. Paragraph 1 of the Article simply states that dividends may be taxed in the State of the recipient's residence.
2. Paragraph 2 provides that the Contracting State from which the dividends are paid also has the right to tax, but the maximum rate of tax that can be imposed is not to exceed 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends. Therefore, in terms of the agreement New Zealand's taxing rights will be restricted to 15 percent of gross dividend even though the rate under domestic law is 30 percent. In the case of New Zealand the limitation is to be achieved by withholding tax of 15 percent being deducted by companies paying the dividends to residents of Belgium.
3. Paragraph 3 defines "dividends" for the purposes of the Article. The effect is that "dividends" has the meaning given to it by section 4 of the Income Tax Act 1976 with respect to New Zealand. In the case of Belgium the term also includes income - even when paid in the form of interest - which is taxable under the head of income on capital invested by the members of a company, other than a company with share capital, which is a resident of Belgium.
4. Paragraph 4 concerns shares which are effectively connected with a permanent establishment. The paragraph merely provides that in the State of source the dividends are taxable as part of the profits of the permanent establishment there owned by the recipient which is a resident of the other State, provided they are paid in respect of holdings forming part of the assets of the permanent establishment or otherwise effectively connected with that establishment. In effect this relieves the State of source of the dividends from any limitations under the Article.
The rules set out above also apply where the recipient of the dividends has in the other State, for the purposes of performing any of the kinds of independent personal services mentioned in Article 14, a fixed base with which the holding in respect of which the dividends are paid is effectively connected.
Prior to 1 April 1982 these qualifications had no effect on the New Zealand tax position because our domestic law provided for a 15 percent final withholding tax in all cases on the gross payment and no convention can extend the taxing rights under domestic law. However, in view of the change in the New Zealand domestic law from 1 April 1982 the New Zealand tax on dividends paid in respect of shares effectively connected with a permanent establishment or fixed base will be a maximum of 30 percent as against the 15 percent maximum applying under the convention, to "non-connected" dividends.
5. Paragraph 5: The main effect of this paragraph is that it restricts the application of taxes on undistributed profits. For example, New Zealand cannot impose excess retention tax on a privately controlled company which is a "resident of Belgium".
Article 11 - Interest
1. Paragraph 1 affirms the taxing right of the State in which the recipient of the interest is a resident.
2. Paragraph 2 also affirms the taxing right of the State in which the interest arises, but the maximum rate of tax that can be imposed is not to exceed 10 percent of the gross amount of the interest. New Zealand's tax is therefore limited to 10 percent on gross interest paid to residents of Belgium instead of the usual 15 percent.
3. Paragraph 3 defines "interest" for the purposes of the Article. Penalty charges are excluded from the term as is income which would, because of a State's domestic law, be classified as a dividend. Therefore, in New Zealand, for example, interest received by debenture holders under debentures to which section 192 or 195 of the Income Tax Act 1976 applies would be dealt with under the dividend Article.
4. Paragraph 4 provides that in the State of source interest is taxable as part of the profits of the permanent establishment there owned by a resident of the other State, provided the interest is paid in respect of debt-claims forming part of the assets of the permanent establishment or otherwise effectively connected with that establishment. In effect this paragraph relieves the State of source of the interest from any limitation under the Article.
This qualification ties in with the New Zealand domestic law which provides that if a non-resident has a fixed establishment in New Zealand, then interest derived is not subject to non-resident withholding tax but is to be assessed on an annual basis.(See section 310 of the Income Tax Act 1976.)
The rules set out above also apply where the recipient of the interest has in the other State, for the purpose of performing any of the kinds of independent personal services mentioned in Article 14, a fixed base with which the debt-claim in respect of which interest is paid is effectively connected.
5. Paragraph 5 is a source rule and precludes argument as to the source of the interest.
The paragraph also deals with interest arising through a permanent establishment or fixed base. Where a loan was contracted for the requirements of that establishment and the interest is borne by the latter, the paragraph determines that the source of the interest is in the Contracting State in which the permanent establishment is situated, leaving aside the place of residence of the owner of that establishment or base.
6. Paragraph 6 is an anti-avoidance provision to ensure that only a reasonable interest payment is taxed at the reduced rate specified in the convention.
Article 12 - Royalties
1. Paragraph 1 affirms the taxing right of the State in which the recipient of the royalties is a resident.
2. Paragraph 2 also affirms the taxing right of the State in which the royalty arises, but the maximum rate of tax that can be imposed is not to exceed 10 percent of the gross amount of the royalty. New Zealand's domestic law is therefore limited to 10 percent on gross royalties instead of the 15 percent minimum. In New Zealand the limitation is achieved by the payer of the royalties deducting 10 percent at the time of payment. In the case of royalties which are subject to annual assessment the tax is limited to 10 percent of the gross payment.
3. Paragraph 3 defines "royalties" for the purposes of the Article. The term includes lump sum payments and certain rents. However, variable or fixed payments for the working of mineral deposits or other natural resources do not fall within the defined term as they are governed by Article 6. Although all royalties and know-how payments (whether lump sum or not) are covered the following should be noted:
- Payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of or the right to use industrial, commercial or scientific equipment are royalties as defined. However, due to paragraph (b) of the Protocol such payments are treated as royalties only if they are "based on or related to, production, sales, performance, or any other similar basis". Where this is not the case, the payment is deemed to be profits of an enterprise to which the provisions of Article 7 apply.
- Likewise payments for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience come within the definition of royalties. However, paragraph (c) of the Protocol negates the application of Article 12 if the payments received are for technical, consultant or supervisory services. In such cases the provisions of Article 7 or Article 14 apply.
- If a payment is made in the form of rent rather than on a royalty basis and the payment comes within the term "royalties" then the 10 percent maximum rate on gross applies. However, rental payments do not constitute royalties under our domestic law and there is, therefore, no non-resident withholding tax applicable. Payments of this nature will be subject to an annual assessment on the net amount after expenses and if the tax so levied exceeds 10 percent of the gross rental, a rebate will be given by virtue of the convention to bring the tax down to 10 percent of gross.
4. Paragraph 4: The comments relating to paragraph 4 of the Dividend Article apply equally here, except that New Zealand's domestic law in relation to royalties provides for a withholding tax rate of 15 percent final on cultural royalties or where the aggregate annual royalty payment does not exceed $1,000, and minimum final in all other cases.
5. Paragraphs 5 and 6: The comments on paragraphs 5 and 6 respectively of the Interest Article apply equally here.
Article 13 - Income from Alienation of Property
1. Paragraph 1 concerns income or gains derived from the alienation of real property. Income from such alienation may be taxed in the State where the property is situated. For example, if a resident of Belgium sells at a profit a real property situated in New Zealand the profit can be taxed in New Zealand if the New Zealand domestic law permits that taxation.
2. Paragraph 2 deals with income or gains derived from the alienation of personal property forming part of the business property of a permanent establishment or pertaining to a fixed base used for the performing of independent personal services. This may be taxed in the State where the permanent establishment or fixed base is situated.
3. Paragraph 3 provides that income or gains from the alienation of ships or aircraft operated in international traffic are taxable only in the State where the effective management of the enterprise is situated.
4. Paragraph 4 stipulates that any income or gains from any property not covered by the Article is to be taxable only in the State which the alienator is a resident.
Article 14 - Independent Personal Services
1. This Article concerns income from professional services (ie, independent personal services) as distinct from income from dependent personal services (eg, remuneration such as salary or wages) which is dealt with separately under Article 15. Income from independent personal services is to be treated in much the same way as "business profits", that is, taxable only in the country of residence unless:
- the taxpayer is present in the other State for a period or periods exceeding in the aggregate 183 days in the income year concerned for the purpose of performing his activities, or
- the services are attributable to a fixed base regularly available to the taxpayer in the other State.
The term "fixed base" is intended to cover a centre of activity of a fixed or permanent character, for instance, a doctor's consulting room or the office of an architect or lawyer.
2. The Article does not apply to artistes and athletes who are dealt with under Article 17.
Article 15 - Dependent Personal Services
1. Paragraph 1 states the general rule that personal services performed by a resident of one of the Contracting States may be taxed in the other Contracting State only if the services are performed in the other Contracting State.
2. Paragraph 2 states the case where exemption will be given by the State visited. The main requirements are that:
- the visit does not exceed 183 days in the aggregate in the income year, or in the taxable period, as the case may be;
- the remuneration is paid by an employer not resident in that State;
- the remuneration is not borne by a permanent establishment or fixed base which the employer has in that State.
Initially New Zealand PAYE tax will be required to be deducted from the remuneration paid but will be refunded at the time of departure provided the requirements of the Article are fully met. In this respect a certificate must be obtained, by the person seeking exemption, from the Belgian tax authorities which certifies that that person is a resident of Belgium for the purposes of Belgian tax.
3. Paragraph 3 provides that remuneration derived from employment aboard a ship or aircraft operating in international traffic may be taxed in the State in which the place of effective management of the shipping or airline enterprise is situated.
This means that if the place of effective management of the enterprise is in Belgium then Belgium has the right to tax the remuneration derived by the employee.
New Zealand would allow credit for any Belgian tax on such remuneration if derived by a New Zealand resident.
Article 16 - Directors' Fees and Other Remuneration
This Article allows the State in which the company paying the fees or other similar payments is resident to have the first right to tax such income. Where a member of the board of directors of a company also has other functions with the company, eg, as ordinary employee, adviser, consultant, etc, the provisions of Article 15 apply as if the remuneration were remuneration of an employee in respect of an employment.
Article 17 - Artistes and Athletes
1. Paragraph 1 enables the State in which the entertainer or athlete is performing the services to tax the income derived from these personal activities.
2. Paragraph 2 deals with the situation where income for the performance of an entertainer or athlete is not paid in full to the entertainer or athlete himself but to another person. The paragraph permits the State in which the performance is given to impose a tax on the profits diverted from the income of the entertainer or athlete to the enterprise where for instance the entertainer or athlete has control over or rights to the income thus diverted or has obtained or will obtain some benefit directly or indirectly from that income. Without this paragraph the State where the services are being performed would in such cases, be unable to tax:
- because it would not be personal service income to the entertainer, and
- in the absence of a permanent establishment the payments could not be taxed as business profits in the hands of the other person.
Article 18 - Pensions
This Article gives the State of residence exclusive rights to tax pensions where they are paid in consideration of past employment. However, this rule is subject to Article 192. wherein Government pensions paid in respect of services rendered need to be paid to an individual who is both a resident and a national of the other State for the exclusive rights of the State of residence to apply. (See definition of "national" in Article 3.) This means that a Belgian Government pension paid to a resident of New Zealand may only be taxed in Belgium if the individual is not also a national of New Zealand.
Article 19 - Government Service
1. This Article deals with remuneration paid to an individual in respect of services rendered to a State or political subdivision or local authority.
2. Paragraph 1 provides for two situations:
- Remuneration paid by a State in respect of services rendered to it by an individual shall be taxed only in that State.
- However, such remuneration shall be taxed exclusively in the other State if the services are rendered in that State by an individual who is a resident of that State, and who is also a national of that State or did not become a resident of that State solely for the purposes of rendering those services.
The situation in (b) can be illustrated as follows.
Remuneration paid by the Belgian Government for services rendered in New Zealand by an individual who is a resident and national of New Zealand shall be taxed exclusively in New Zealand. This is still the position even though the individual, although a national of New Zealand, did become a resident of New Zealand for the purposes of rendering those services for the Belgian Government.
3. Paragraph 2 deals with Government pensions. (See explanation to Article 18 in this supplement.)
4. Paragraphs 1 and 2 do not apply if the services are performed in connection with business carried on by the State, or one of its political subdivisions or local authorities, paying the remuneration. Under paragraph 3 the ordinary rules apply: Article 15 for wages and salaries, Article 16 for directors' fees and Article 18 for pensions.
Article 20 - Professors and Teachers
Under this Article a Belgian teacher or professor is exempt from New Zealand tax on his income from carrying out teaching in New Zealand if:
- he visits New Zealand for not more than two years;
- he is a resident of Belgium;
- his visit is solely for the purpose of teaching.
The same rules apply conversely to a resident of New Zealand visiting Belgium for the same purpose.
Article 21 - Students
This Article exempts from New Zealand tax, maintenance, education or training payments received here from overseas by a student or business apprentice from Belgium. Note:
- The student or apprentice must have been a resident of Belgium immediately before he comes to New Zealand.
- He must be in New Zealand solely for the purpose of his education training.
- The payments must be made from sources outside New Zealand.
- There is no time limit on the period spent in New Zealand.
* The exemption is restricted to the payments mentioned, ie, for maintenance.
The converse applies to a New Zealand student or apprentice going to Belgium.
Article 22 - Other Income
1. This Article provides a general rule relating to income not dealt with in the other Articles of the Convention. The income concerned is not only income of a class not expressly dealt with but also income from sources not expressly mentioned. A secondary effect of the Article is to clarify the situation of income derived from a third country by a person who could be "resident in" both Belgium and New Zealand under the general laws of each country. Under the agreement that person can be a "resident of" only one country. In such a situation the taxing rights are allocated to the country "of" which he is a resident.
2. Income derived by a resident of New Zealand is taxed exclusively in New Zealand unless the income is derived from sources in Belgium. If the income is derived from sources in Belgium it may also be taxed there and a credit for the Belgian tax is given in New Zealand, should that income be liable for New Zealand tax. The converse will apply in the case of a resident of Belgium. Cases of conflict between two residences are to be determined by reference to Article 4.
Article 23 - Elimination of Double Taxation
This Article contains the normal rules whereby each State gives credit for the other State's tax when assessing its residents on income derived from sources in the other State. It should be noted that the credit provisions in the Article are subject to the domestic law of each country.
Article 24 - Mutual Agreement Procedure
Article 25 - Exchange of Information
These are standard articles and require no additional comment.
Article 26 - Diplomatic and Consular Privileges
1. The aim of this Article is to ensure that diplomatic agents or consular officers shall, under the Convention receive no less favourable treatment than that to which they are entitled under international law or under special international agreements.
2. Paragraph 2 establishes that the sending State is to be the State of residence for members of diplomatic or consular missions provided they are regarded as residents under the domestic law of that State.
3. Paragraph 3 ensures that international organisations, organs or officials thereof, or members of a diplomatic mission of a third State, who are liable in one of the Contracting States in respect only of income from sources therein shall not have the benefit of the Convention.
Article 27 - Territorial Extension
This is a standard article and requires no further comment.
Article 28 - Entry into Force
This Article provides that the Convention will take effect:
(a) In New Zealand:
in respect of income assessable for any income year beginning on or after 1 April 1984;
(b) in Belgium:
- in respect of all taxes due at source, on income credited or payable on or after 1 January 1984;
- in respect of all taxes other than taxes due at source, on income of taxable periods ending on or after 31 December 1984.
Article 29 - Termination
This Article sets out the procedure if either State wishes to terminate the Convention. Unless notice of termination is given in accordance with the Article the Convention continues indefinitely.
The protocol deals with those items where some further explanation is required of points not covered in the Article concerned. The main points are explained earlier in this supplement on an Article by Article basis.