TIB - November 2005
Interpretation statements
- Shortfall penalty for not taking reasonable care
- Shortfall penalty – unacceptable interpretation and unacceptable tax position
Legislation and determinations
- Foreign currency amounts – conversion to New Zealand currency
New legislation
- Withholding tax changes for fruit picking contractors
- Correction – Excess imputation credits
Legal decisions – case notes
- High Court dismisses judicial review application: Rogerson v CIR
- Taxpayer challenges Commissioner's power to enforce a guarantee: Michael john Peterson v CIR (Judicial Review)
- Group loss offset rules unavailable to lost attributing qualifying company (LAQC): TRA No 0006/04, Decision No 015/2005
- No tenable cause of action: TRA No 147/04, Decision No 13/2005
- Notice of defence struck out: TRA No 09/012, Decision No 012/2005
- Transaction held to involve tax avoidance under Goods and Services Tax Act: Glenharrow Holdings Limited v CIR
- Taxpayer must issue NOPA to “default” assessment: Donald Eugene Allen v CIR
- CIR not able to add new ground to appeal: CIR v Zentrum Holdings Ltd and Ngahemi Properties Ltd, as the Zentrum Holdings Group
Standard practice statements
- Remission of penalties and interest – SPS 05/10